The Great American Circus
The North American government has once again revealed its true nature, yet many still can't see beyond the obvious twisted and sad reality of our nation.
The world seems to be in chaos, with the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the various Israel conflicts serving as the latest, most evident examples of the turmoil orchestrated by the US, adding to an already unstable global situation. It's also crucial to recognize that these events are unlikely to be the last.
This is especially true in the long-established Middle East, a region of great importance due to its historical background, but most importantly, its abundant natural resources.
We live in an era plagued by war, driven by money and power—a perpetual issue in society—along with propaganda and false narratives. The world appears to be deteriorating, and no one seems to care enough to stop it. Those in power who could make a difference choose not to act, instead prioritizing their wealthy sponsors and interests.
A few days ago, during one of my usual conversations with a local libertarian leader—often random rants and discussions on a variety of topics ranging from domestic to foreign affairs—we touched on the subject of the Establishment. With a confident yet sinister grin, he said, "The circus worked when it got to Rome. Let's have the circus, let's play the circus, but let's not forget it's still a circus." His words left me momentarily speechless.
Lets talk about the circus.
The North American government has once again revealed its true nature, yet many still can't see beyond the obvious twisted and sad reality of our nation. Let's make a deal: allow me to share some of my thoughts, and then you can decide for yourself.
Israel-Palestine
I want to emphasize my impartiality regarding both the Israel-Palestine and Ukraine-Russia conflicts, as well as any other significant topics I touch upon in this brief but informative summary of various influential figures in our ongoing "Cultural Battle.”
However, let's look beyond the usual facts and dig a little deeper. It doesn't take long to uncover some skeletons buried beneath the surface, along with other rotten secrets. I always tell people, If someone can prove that my data is not correct please prove me wrong, I'm open to it and I'll leave my email at the very end.
World-renowned and widely recognized psychologist Jordan Peterson has addressed this issue. He stated that to understand one side, you need to go back a couple of hundred years, and to understand the other side, you need to go back a couple of thousand years.
It is impossible for me to debate that.
That's the reality of war. However, let's not overlook that the Israel-Palestine conflict has been ongoing since the time of Jesus, making it hard to imagine any foreseeable resolution, if it ever ends at all.
The reality is that Netanyahu is not holding back and seems determined to eliminate all Palestinians, which apparently takes precedence over addressing his own legal troubles.
He is dealing with three court cases involving several charges, including fraud and bribery. One case alleges he accepted extravagant gifts from wealthy businessmen, but there are more severe accusations as well. He denies any wrongdoing, and the outcomes of the cases are uncertain. However, his actions, such as backing controversial legislation, indicate a desire to remain in power, likely believing that retaining his position could protect him from his legal issues.
However, the Israeli public is also outraged with Netanyahu over the security lapse that led to the Hamas attack on October 7. He has crafted his image around his ability to protect Israel, yet he has refused to acknowledge any failure. Moreover, he has hinted that he may not step down even after the war ends, if and when that happens.
I honestly never thought to say that crooked Joe Biden was right, how ironic, but he gave a speech in 1986 where he said that “Israel was the best 3 Billion dollar investment we made.”
To understand this alliance, we must acknowledge the clear connection between the USA and Israel and the reality of our situation. The US played a significant role in establishing Israel, and Israel is a key factor in maintaining American influence in that region. Without Israel, the US would struggle to maintain its active presence in this perpetually conflict-ridden area.
Lets take a look at the Iron Dome, a sophisticated and impressive system, but more importantly, it's highly efficient. Every time I see it intercepting targets, I can't help but think, "What a great use of our taxes, just not for us.”
The Iron Dome is a missile intercept system developed and deployed by Israel, designed to shoot down rockets and missiles aimed at the country. The U.S. played a direct role in its development, contributing over $1.6 billion in funding.
In 2021, even before the September 23 vote, the U.S. had already allocated $500 million to Israel for the Iron Dome and other missile defense systems. In 2018, the U.S. and Israel signed a 10-year memorandum of understanding, committing the U.S. to providing Israel with $3.3 billion annually in military funding, plus $500 million each year for missile defense, including the Iron Dome.
Imagine if all that money had been directed towards our nation instead. It could have supported the healthcare system, provided funds for small business owners, and bolstered our struggling economy. It could have helped hardworking families who are barely making ends meet. Unfortunately, it seems our leaders don't prioritize these issues.
It's terrible to see the violence perpetrated by both Hamas and Israel, resulting in the deaths of innocent people who had no involvement or interest in the conflict.
Let's face the truth, though.
It's undeniable that Palestinians have been forcibly displaced from their land, their homes destroyed, facing daily violence, and confined to a small piece of territory that's basically an open-air jail.
My thoughts often turn to what might happen if both parties truly sought a peaceful resolution. This seems unlikely based on the current environment, the past, and the most likely future.
t's important to acknowledge that Hamas is a recognized terrorist organization. However, Palestinians lack a formal government and land, so they rely on Hamás for defense. Can we expect them not to try to protect themselves?
Imagine living in a town with no government, proper law enforcement, or anyone to manage affairs, and a cartel steps in to offer protection. While "protection" might be a stretch, it’s clear who has a well-funded, massive army. Neither side is innocent in this conflict, and that is an undeniable fact.
Initially, Israel was positioned as a counterbalance to Soviet influence, but this rationale continued even after the Cold War ended. This became even more significant after 9/11, when it was revealed that some of the attackers were Saudi citizens, even though Saudi Arabia is a key ally. In light of doubts about relying on the Saudis, the U.S. turned more heavily to Israel, believing that their values and interests were compatible.
The U.S. has offered financial aid and support to Israel, Palestine, and even Iran. It’s essential for the conflict to persist, no matter where the violent clashes occur.
Now Macron is saying he will also send troops and weapons. Check out the sponsors of his campaign, and I'm sure you'll see the specific "weapon" he wants to "sell."
This leads me to the next subject: Ukraine. Reports have indicated that Hunter Biden was involved in obvious illicit enrichment there, leaving behind a clearly documented financial trail from beginning to end.
Ukraine-Russia
The Biden administration tried to secure additional funds for Ukraine before the Iran most recent escalation. President Zelensky continues to assert that he is running low on ammunition and soldiers. However, these requests were rejected by Congress, with Republicans accusing Democrats of financial irresponsibility and blaming them for starting the Russia-Ukraine war.
Given the complexity of these topics, I'll overlook the possibility that the U.S. was involved directly or indirectly in the attack on the Iranian embassy in Syria. It’s clear that Israel and the U.S. coordinate closely and would not act without the consent of their Northamerican ally.
Then, we started seeing horrible accusations against Iran, comparing them to Nazis and calling for a global alliance to defeat the so-called next “Reich." These statements came from the Israeli representative at the UN convention. Claims of an imminent large-scale attack by Iran turned out to be exaggerated. Instead, Iran deployed small drones that took about 8 hours to reach their targets and some old, ineffective missiles. The attack was pre-announced and reported by several news outlets.
When the "world coalition" intercepted these missiles, it was essentially a show, with no real attack or credible threat. It was more of a poorly staged soap opera that many people believed.
What followed was a "bipartisan" action that allocated billions of dollars to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. Our hard-earned American taxpayer money is going everywhere but here at home.
I'm not even going to delve into North American interests in the Kinmen Islands and other Taiwanese geopolitical interests in this never-ending geopolitical saga. And let's not get into the Nord Stream pipeline incident—that's a whole other issue.
It was definitely the Joe Biden administration responsible for the bombing of this significant avenue, putting Germany in a difficult position and choking Europe. Just no one wants to admit it, at least not yet.
The Comedy of Politics
Rúben Gisbert has nicknamed the him“Joe Wayne”, in reference to the great actor John Wayne who dominated the movie screens with his famous war and old west characters.
Let's start with the fact that Russia and Ukraine had an agreement to maintain peace not too long ago. Zelensky, a former comedian, used this promise of peace with Russia as a key part of his campaign, which helped him get elected. He pledged peace and prosperity for his people. Now, he's a millionaire, his troops have suffered heavy casualties, and Ukraine is likely to lose to Russia. We all know it. If we stop funding the conflict, Ukraine has no means to fight on its own. Meanwhile, Zelensky's family will be set financially for generations
Russia had always been clear about not wanting a U.S. presence in Ukraine and warned us not to interfere. However, the Biden administration sent Vice President Kamala Harris to Europe, where she publicly stated that the U.S. would protect Ukraine and praised Zelensky's desire to join NATO. This provocative stance contributed to Russia starting the war.
We also need to note that Boris Johnson advised Ukraine against signing their peace agreement. Have we forgotten that already?
The European weapons industry also benefits from this. My expertise in European affairs, however, doesn't compare with Pedro Baños and Rubén Gisbert, who continue to provide valuable content on their networks for everyone to access..
If we want to ignore those narratives, fine, but they played a significant role in escalating the conflict.
Now, let's discuss the actual war in Ukraine and the weapons and strategies being tested there. It's true that the U.S. gets to test its weapons and tactics without directly involving our military, which some people consider invaluable. However, the billions of dollars we've approved for this conflict provide a tangible estimate of the financial cost.
I wonder if people realize that they ve never seen actually data of the war. Its always some misleading Title about the conflict but rarely real information, like the numbers, which never lie.
Furthermore, with the dwindling number of Ukrainian soldiers—since Russia has killed many—the expensive and massive weapons we are providing are largely being evaded by Russian forces.
It's true that the Ukrainian army might not be as prepared as the American armed forces. However, our weapons are failing on multiple fronts and are not significantly impacting Russia, a fact that few people are discussing.
Let's analyze a recent report from Colonel Markus Reisner, director of the Austrian Theresian Military Academy.
In the summer of 2023, Ukraine (with support from the US-led coalition) was using about 7,000 artillery shells per day in key artillery zones, while Russia was firing around 5,000 rounds daily. Currently, the depleted Ukrainian army is using 2,000 shells per day compared to Russia's 10,000 shells per day under Putin.
In his analysis, Reisner details how Ukraine attempted to use first-person-view drones to repel Russian attacks. However, these drones are ineffective against enemy artillery, as they only have a range of about 5 km, occasionally extending to 10 km.
With the Russians initiating and engaging from approximately 20 km away, the Ukrainians are unable to effectively counter the Russian forces, which already outnumber them.
Colonel Reisner also highlights the adaptation aspect for the Russians.
He demonstrates how the weapons sent by the North Americans are not as effective as they were at the start of the war. For example, JDAM-ER (Joint Direct Attack Munition, Extended Range) systems are being heavily jammed, as are the STORM SHADOW-SCALP (long-range deep strike weapons).
The same issue is affecting HIMARS rockets, with about 50%-70% of them being jammed.
The situation is worst for the EXCALIBUR
. At the beginning of the war, Ukrainians were hitting about 70% of their targets, but now that rate has dropped to about 6%. This indicates significant improvement in Russian jamming and electronic warfare capabilities.
Look for the candidates who received money from Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, MBDA and Airforce Technology. These are the four manufacturers of ineffective and expensive weapons. You then will realize which dirty candidates they have in their pocket.
The Kremlin in numbers
The Russians have been increasing their investment in their army and defense systems.
According to to an euronews.com, Over the next three years, they will experience a significant surge in spending, reaching 36.6 trillion rubles (€376.7 billion) in 2024, with an expected deficit of 1.595 trillion rubles (€16.4 billion).
This allocation marks a notable increase in defense investment, with spending on defense and security combined expected to constitute around 40% of the total budget expenditure next year.
To avoid extending this discussion further, I won't elaborate on how US sanctions and actions (like Nord Stream) have actually helped the BRICS alliance grow since the sanctions began.
Russia's gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate for 2023 was 3.59% compared to the previous year, following a 1.2% drop in 2022. In the first quarter of 2024, Russia's GDP grew by 5.4%, which some analysts say reflects the resilience of the Russian economy. However, the Bank of Russia's forecast for 2024 GDP growth is more modest, at 2.5–3.5%, while Trading Economics expects growth to reach 2.5% by the end of the year.
The reality of the situation
The Ukrainian army is being defeated, and so is our indirect military effort. Yes, we are currently being defeated by Russia indirectly. But the U.S. aims to make Russia expend as much effort and resources as possible in trying to regain control of Europe. Therefore, prolonging the war, even if Ukraine ultimately loses, serves this purpose.
All this information can be verified by looking into discussions from a group of individuals dedicated to addressing global matters with integrity and clarity. These advocates, who continually struggle against the forces of money and corruption, include notable figures like Pedro Baños, Rubén Gisbert, Alberto Iturralde, Whitney Webb, and Jimmy Dore, among many others.
I personally believe that these very smart and dedicated individuals, have continued to support real news with real data on their extremely controlled and limited platforms because we all know that right now, freedom of speech seems like a utopia.
I like to think of them as a coalition of sensible community advocates, specializing in real journalism, and for that, the world should be forever thankful.
In North America, we've become accustomed to looking for a savior within our one-party system (let's not pretend it's anything else). At the end of the day, both parties receive funding from the same corporations, with sponsors often backing both sides simultaneously.
Occasionally, an outlier—a renegade—emerges, genuinely trying to do something good for the people. However, such individuals typically face immense challenges just for attempting to do their job. This blatant irony makes you wonder how often we've erred by giving so much power to these people. Unfortunately, these well-intentioned individuals are a small minority who usually can't fight alone in Congress or office.
We engage in the Republicans vs. Democrats debate, arguing over which is better for our nation. I believe Republicans generally do better, particularly on issues like border security and legislation. However, both parties are controlled by the same interests, follow the same policies, and push the same wars. The system fails when both parties become ineffective. So, what do we do next?
But let's return to North Americans and their financial "wisdom of thoughts.”
What they are truly interested in is their financial stability. They don't tell you that this already wealthy group of greedy individuals still wants more. They benefit from war because they own the largest war machine manufacturers in the world. They sell their weapons and create global conflicts, supplying at least one side in exchange for billions of dollars, all at the expense of our tax dollars and many innocent lives.
But that's only part of what they do. For example, they ignore addressing the currently uncontrolled intelligence agencies or holding bankers accountable for actions that are not in America's best interest. This is just a small sample of the issues they choose to overlook.
The Establishment
Candidates from both parties are often invited to the same fancy global hotspots, where they are wooed with money and other gratifications.
There are many companies involved in lobbying, so I won't elaborate extensively, but I'll provide a couple of examples. Two notable companies involved in the deep state and benefiting from war are the Carlyle Group and The Boeing Company.
Let's start with the first one, the Carlyle Group, because I quite like how sophisticated it sounds.
The Carlyle Group Inc. is indeed an American multinational corporation specializing in private equity, alternative asset management, and financial services, with assets under management totaling $426 billion. It's one of the largest mega-funds globally and was ranked as the world's largest private equity firm by capital raised over a five-year period in 2015, according to the PEI 300 index. However, by 2023, it had slipped to fifth place.
David Rubenstein, co-founder of The Carlyle Group, has been seen on stage with notable figures like Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, and many others.
Regarding political influence, political action committees (PACs) are organizations that privately raise money to support candidates, ballot measures, campaigns, or legislation. According to data from the Center for Responsive Politics, while asset managers like BlackRock and State Street have their own PACs, Carlyle appears to be one of the few major private equity firms to have established one.
Federal Election Commission documents reveal that 35 different managing directors, principals, and executives at the Washington, D.C.-based firm have collectively contributed $130,660 to the PAC since April. The PAC was initiated in late 2018, as indicated by FEC documents.
Stacey Dion, the global head of government affairs at Carlyle, explained via email, “Part of the value-add that Carlyle brings to its portfolio companies is our government affairs and regulatory expertise. As a component of that, we launched our PAC earlier this year to engage in an important part of the political process by contributing to candidates, regardless of party affiliation, who support the work of our companies and share our firm’s interests.”
Dion also serves as the treasurer of the PAC, as per FEC documents.
Carlyle’s PAC is categorized as a connected PAC, which means the firm can cover all administrative expenses on behalf of the PAC, according to former FEC chairman Michael Toner.
Since its inception, the PAC has allocated funds to Congressional members such as Rep. Katherine Clark (D-Massachusetts), Rep. George Holding (R-North Carolina), Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-California), Sen. Martha McSally (R-Arizona), and Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Missouri).
FEC data also indicates that the PAC contributed to outside groups, including the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the National Republican Congressional Committee, Committee for Hispanic Causes-BOLD PAC, and the Congressional Black Caucus PAC.
The Boeing Company is an American multinational corporation that specializes in designing, manufacturing, and selling airplanes, rotorcraft, rockets, satellites, and missiles globally. Additionally, the company offers leasing and product support services.
Boeing ranks among the largest aerospace manufacturers worldwide and is the fourth-largest defense contractor globally based on 2022 revenue. It is also the largest exporter in the United States by dollar value. Boeing was founded by William Boeing in Seattle, Washington, on July 15, 1916. The present corporation is the result of the merger of Boeing with McDonnell Douglas on August 1, 1997.
In the 2020 elections, Boeing donated a total of $1,823,500 to federal candidates for their 2019-2020 campaigns. Of this amount, $858,000 (47.05%) went to Democrats, while $965,500 (52.95%) went to Republicans.
During the House of Representatives that same year, Republicans received $801,500 (50.65%) in donations, while Democrats received $781,000 (49.35%).
The examples you provided indeed illustrate how corporations like Boeing engage in bipartisan support, contributing financially to candidates from both major political parties across the United States.
It's a common refrain to hear that voting for candidate "Z" will bring about positive change, while others argue that voting for candidate "Y" is the better choice. This dynamic has persisted for decades, leading to the current state of affairs and the mess we find ourselves in, along with the blood spilled in conflicts around the world.
Nowadays, many people find themselves voting not for the candidate who will truly help them, but rather for the one who will affect them the least. It's a sobering reality that reflects the complex and often frustrating nature of the political landscape.
The infamous Election system
It's concerning to see professional criminals in power who strive to maintain their positions indefinitely. The connections between Dominion Voting Systems, Smartmatic, and manipulated voting systems used by figures like Maduro and Chávez are indeed alarming.
Although some individuals are aware of this fact, the majority are not: We utilize an electronic and controlled program, developed by a former CIA contractor, John Poulos and James Hoover, which sources its software from another company owned, developed, and tested in Venezuela. This system, has been implicated in election manipulation in places like Venezuela and othercountries.
Ita called Dominion Voting Systems and I have already conducted some preliminary research on this matter using my somewhat outdated platform, and I intend to delve deeper into it in the future.
This system uses software supplied by Smartmatic.
Founded in 2000, Smartmatic was started by Antonio Mugica, Alfredo José Anzola, and Roger Pinate. It gained immediate attention when it was selected to replace voting machines in Venezuela ahead of Hugo Chávez's reelection in 2004. Further expansion occurred in 2006 with the acquisition of Sequoia Voting Systems, which it divested later. As of today, Smartmatic operates voting systems in a number of countries around the world.
However, for now, let's shift our focus as I haven't had the opportunity to thoroughly discuss it.
Despite our democratic facade, the likelihood of the senile and cognitively impaired Biden winning this election seems implausible. Trump is poised for victory, though it's uncertain if a few promising years under his leadership can rectify the decades of conflicts we've sowed. Furthermore, it's evident that Trump ascended to power and became entwined with the establishment. Our voting system's unreliability mirrors a tragicomic spectacle reminiscent of 'The Truman Show,' overshadowing our actual lives. Nevertheless, we must navigate this reality and strive to make the best of it. This is the establishment, a topic I've explored previously, albeit without realizing Trump's complicity. Now, amidst his full-fledged campaign, the evidence is irrefutable for those willing to see it. It's as simple as that.
Initially, I bought into Trump's rhetoric against the establishment, but his presidency revealed a different reality, advocating for projects like a new FBI building, strengthening an independent executive branch. It's ironic considering how that same entity betrayed him, like when they suppressed Hunter Biden's laptop scanda and many other things. Though I won't delve too deeply into it now.
Moving forward, I still believe Republican leadership is crucial for our nation's progress, or perhaps a moderate Democrat untainted by Soros' influence. Sadly, the current power dynamics within the Democratic Party make this unlikely, evident in their campaign sponsors. Once again, the evidence is clear if you take a closer look.
Yet again, our government delivers another blow to its people, yet we've endured so many that we've grown numb to the pain.
At the end of every day, regardless of what you do or dont do, we are not really in control, we are not really deciding either.
We are just like animals in a zoo.
I contacted Daniel Stchigel, a renowned defender of the global community from Argentina, who gave his opinion on the matter, clarifying in advance that he was not an expert on these issues, "I do not believe that Russia has not provoked this war with Ukraine. Putin is with the hands stained with blood the same as the US and Europe. To be honest, I am not very optimistic about the future in that sense. The discourse on North American Imperialism was always the workhorse of the communists to justify their genocides. There is no doubt that the United States also maintains itself with sword and fire. I think that to give a more neutral vision to the subject, one could refer to Orwell's 1984. It it is all explained there, in a book written in 1948.
“China acts on both fronts, doing business as it sees fit. It is part of the BRICS along with Iran, Russia and India, but it sells North American franchise products.” Dr. Stchigel added.
“The truth is, I suspect something that no one has wanted to hear from me. It seems silly, but I think Putin's war against the West started when Russia was disqualified for doping in the Winter Olympics. And it is no coincidence that the invasion of Ukraine began when in Tokyo Russia had to appear without a flag and without an anthem, and on top of that they gave up in artistic gymnastics. At that moment I thought that Russia was not going to let the affront go.” He concluded by clarifying that this was only his hypothesis.
Daniel Omar Stchigel has a doctor and degree in philosophy from the UBA, and a university professor and master's degree in psychoanalysis from Kennedy University. He is the author of almost 20 books on epistemology and psychoanalysis.
Among the various areas in which he has worked, he also served as a university professor for fifteen years, at Kennedy University and at the National University of Lomas de Zamora.
The Nightcap
I want to emphasize that this article arises from a genuine commitment to justice and peace, and journalism, devoid of any antisemitic bias.
I condemn all sides involved in war for the killing of many innocent lives throughout history. Though it would be ideal if there were no more conflicts in the future, I am aware that's impossible.
I hold deep respect for all humans, irrespective of their religious or ideological affiliations because as humans we all have our rights. While I may disagree with many people on various issues, it's important to recognize that I, too, am human and entitled to my opinions.
As someone of Arab descent, I even have Hebrew tattoos with profound meanings, chosen to honor the original biblical language. While I may not align with traditional religious beliefs, I believe that striving to embody the values depicted in the Bible could greatly improve our society versus not doing it.
Although people who know me know that I am a person who is a little disconnected from God but at the end of the day, I choose to believe that he exists. If that were not the case, evil could not be fought.
In fact, no one cares what I think, and no one should care either, which is why all of this is written in the form of data and facts, which are largely ignored by most journalists and media outlets.
While I may not align with some of the traditional religious beliefs, I believe that striving to embody the values described in the Bible could greatly improve our society rather than not.
This is just a glimpse of the broader reality unfolding, and I urge people not to accept what they see, hear, or read at face value. Take it as a starting point, then delve deeper and investigate. It may be laborious, but it's worth it to get to the truth.
As you can see, even though some may find this lengthy, we're delving into an infinite number of intricate and sensitive topics, each deserving its own comprehensive writing examination.
In conclusion, I often share a message: "Don't trust me; do your own research." Your discoveries will validate my assertions.
Let's just fight for a more dignified circus, at the very least.
Let me hear your thoughts,
Strategieselevated@gmail.com
*This brief informative summary was first published in Spanish on arca.news and fronterizo.news.